Intel outpriced yet again: Asus ZenBook 14 UM425 with Ryzen 7 4700U comes with twice the RAM and twice the storage than the pricier Tiger Lake UX425 version

Laptops with Tiger Lake made their debut in early October with the Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA being one of the first laptops available. As of this writing, the 14-inch laptop with the Core i7-1165G7 CPU, 8 GB of RAM, 512 GB PCIe SSD, and FHD display can be found for about $900 USD — a reasonable price for the latest 11th gen Intel processor.

What potential buyers should be aware of, however, is that this exact same chassis is also available with the latest AMD Ryzen processors. The ZenBook 14 UM425IA swaps out the Intel chip with the Ryzen 7 4700U which we’ve already proven can hold its own fairly well when up against the Core i7-1165G7. Not only that, but the UM425IA comes with double the RAM (16 GB vs 8 GB), double the storage (1 TB vs 512 GB), and even Windows 10 Pro instead of Windows 10 Home. The advantages don’t stop there either as the AMD-powered version is currently retailing for $850 USD or $50 less than the Intel-powered version.

Intel still has one important checkbox on its side that the AMD model doesn’t offer: Thunderbolt support. The UM425IA supports up to USB 3.2 speeds only compared to both Thunderbolt 3 and Thunderbolt 4 support on the UX425EA. Users planning on connecting external graphics docks or high-performance NVMe storage docks would have no choice but to go with the Intel model. For everyone else, the RAM increase will be far more valuable especially since system RAM is soldered and therefore non-upgradeable on the ZenBook 14.

This gaming PC with an RTX 2080 is on sale for $1,270

Nvidia technically released its new GeForce RTX 3080 graphics card two months ago, but the card has been almost impossible to find in stock since then. However, PC manufacturers are still looking to get rid of their gaming PCs with older GPUs, which means opportunistic sales for us. You can now get an MSI Aegis gaming desktop with an RTX 2080 graphics card for $1,270 at Newegg, making it one of the cheapest pre-built PCs we’ve ever seen with an RTX 2080, and currently the least-expensive option on Newegg.

The model on sale has an Intel Core i7-9700F processor, which is now one generation out of date, but still packs 8 cores and 8 threads with a maximum clock speed of 4.7GHz. You also get 16GB of 3,000MHz RAM (2x8GB), a 1TB SSD of unknown type for storage, a 650W power supply, a Z370 “Gaming Plus” motherboard (presumably this one from MSI, though the product page leaves out the maker). Pre-built gaming PCs typically have one or two strange or cheaply-made components that can spoil the package, like a low-power PSU or single-channel memory, but there doesn’t appear to be any trickery here.

The included graphics card is none other than Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 2080, the company’s first high-end ray-tracing GPU. It’s still an incredible graphics card, even with the later introduction of the 2080 Ti and 2080 Super, and it won’t have any problem playing every single PC game currently available at 1080p or 1440p.

Apple likely to unveil the ARM-based 13-inch MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and 16-inch MacBook Pro on November 10

Despite their announcement several months ago, Apple has been fairly tight-lipped about when it will unveil the world’s first ARM-based Macbooks. Earlier reports have told us that the notebooks would likely land before the year ends. Thankfully, that wait got a whole lot shorter, as Apple just announced its ‘One More Thing’ event on November 10.

A report from Bloomberg suggests that Apple will unveil three new Macbooks at the event, namely a 13-inch MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and a 16-inch MacBook Pro. Renowned Twitter leaker l0vetodream also confirms that there will be two 13-inch MacBooks but neglected to mention the exact model.

We can also expect Apple to unveil a new iPad Pro alongside the MacBooks. An earlier report told us that Apple’s in-house silicon was likely to come in two variants, one with eight cores and the other with twelve. The former will likely be a modified version of the A14X Bionic, which is also set to power the iPad Pro.

Considering that MacBooks need to pack a more formidable punch than iPads, we can expect Apple to use a 4+4 (power/efficiency) configuration on the eight-core chip and an 8+4 layout on the eight-core variant. There’s a more powerful sixteen-core version of the silicon due to hit the shelves in 2021.

Lenovo Yoga 9i 15 unboxing and first impressions

Lenovo’s Yoga 9 series (previously the Yoga C900 series, and before that the Yoga 900 series) is always a pleasure. It’s the flagship of the company’s consumer offerings, and it has some solid, well-thought-out features. One of those is the Dolby Atmos rotating soundbar, which you can see in the image above. No matter what orientation you’re using the PC, you’ve got powerful sound firing in your direction.

Lenovo sent me the 15-inch model, which is the more powerful one. There’s also a 14-inch variant that has your standard 15W processors and integrated graphics. The 15-inch one is for another level of performance though. This thing comes with 10th-generation Intel processors in the 45W variety, and it has dedicated graphics in the form of an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with 4GB GDDR6.

Coming in at 4.41 pounds, it’s pretty light for a 15-inch convertible with such power, and it still has a 69Whr battery. Another feature that I absolutely love is the pen garage. It’s something that debuted on ThinkPad convertibles, and eventually made its way to the consumer brand. It’s a nice and easy way to always have the pen with you and charged.

ACER PREDATOR HELIOS 300 GAMING LAPTOP REVIEW

The Acer Predator Helios 300 has always been a great entry-to-mid-level gaming laptop, thanks to its focus on the sweet spot between performance and price. That’s why it’s been consistently featured as one of the best gaming laptops over the last few years. The 2020 updated model brings a 240Hz display and some minor, but welcome, aesthetic changes while keeping the costs per frame to a manageable level.

With the release of Nvidia’s newest RTX 30-series of graphics cards, RTX 20-series laptops are in an interesting position because we won’t have these new powerful GPUs showing up in laptops any time soon (at least not until well into 2021). So if you’re banking on playing Doom Eternal at a ridiculously high frame rate, you’re may have to wait a little longer. 

This year’s Predator Helios 300 boasts a 15-inch $1,500 config with the latest Intel Core i7 CPU, 16GB RAM (expandable to 32GB), 512GB SSD, 240Hz 1080p IPS panel display, and an RTX 2070 Super with Max Q Design.

The chassis for 2020’s Helios 300 got some minor updates, with the most noticeable being the power adapter now plugs into the back of the machine as opposed to the side, which is a welcome change. 

Another thing which struck me is that the Predator branding is now only located on the inside of the laptop. I get it; some people might be a little self-conscious using a laptop with the word ‘Predator’ on it in public. It’s okay, the blue accents will still let people know that you’re a gamer, so no worries there. 

The metal cover with anodized finish gives the Helios a more sturdy feel than previous years, though I would have loved to have seen it all over the laptop instead of just the cover.

The see-through keycaps make the 4-zone RGB lighting really pop and I like how the WASD and arrow keys can be highlighted using Predator Sense, Acer’s software for controlling lighting, overclocking, fan control, etc.

The stock 512GB SSD is frankly pretty small considering the size of games these days, especially considering it’s the only storage available. You’d be lucky to fit both Red Dead 2 and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare on there with your Windows install. The Helios 300 does have available slots for two SSDs and an HDD so upgrading down the road only requires a screwdriver and a decent-sized storage drive. 

The $1,500 price puts it in the middle of the pack between mid-tier gaming laptops like the budget warrior Dell G5 15 SE and the pricey Asus Zephyrus G14. Though it’s worth pointing out that the Helios’ game performance really punches above its weight class by keeping pace with the Asus G14 in almost every category for a few hundred dollars cheaper. 

The CPU performance doesn’t really shock me. The Intel Core i7-9750H CPU has fairly reliable scores of 1275 CB on Cinebench R15 and 5182 on Geekbench 5, making it roughly on par with the half dozen Intel systems we’ve tested this year. This means Helios 300 is more than ready to handle the most common CPU-intensive tasks like video and photo editing. 

Speaking of gaming, we got decent numbers from the 2070 Max-Q with ray-tracing turned on, delivering 42fps in Metro Exodus and 54fps for Shadow of the Tomb Raider. The Helios 300 also did well running traditional rasterized games too, topping 75fps on Total War Saga: Troy and hitting almost 70fps on Division 2.

If you’re desperate for just that little bit of extra gaming performance, and hang the sense of it—or the sound and fury of it—the Turbo button is Acer’s one-touch GPU overclocking feature. The Predator laptops have this simple feature designed to eke out as much extra gaming performance as possible. 

In theory it’s a neat feature but, much as we saw with the Predator Triton earlier this year, you really only get about a 1-3% increase in performance. It also makes your system run very hot and distractingly loud. Honestly, I really don’t think it’s worth it unless you’re truly militant about maximizing your frames per second. Or have a really good noise-cancelling gaming headset.

But for its $1,500 sticker price the 15-inch Predator Helios 300 provides high-end 1080p gaming performance at a mid-range price. Even without the dubious utility of the Turbo button. The design changes are small but smart (like the power cord in the back instead of the side), having room for three storage drives (2x SSD, 1x HDD) is handy, and the price/performance ratio is great. And that all makes the latest Acer Helios 300 a strong contender for one of the best gaming laptops out there this year. 

Porsche Design Launches a Carbon-Detailed i7 Laptop With Acer

After a three-year hiatus in its venture into the laptop market, Porsche Design has now teamed up with Acer to launch the Acer Book RS i7, boasting a perfect combination of aesthetics and performance.

Designed with the brand’s usual minimalist sensibilities in mind, the new laptop is constructed with a sleek silver body carrying carbon detailing on its back surface, paired with a matching computer mouse. The bundle includes a black leather notebook sleeve with an integrated mouse pad for both business users and travelers who find themselves always on the go.

Of course, the laptop’s performance is equally as attractive. Powered by the latest 11th Gen Intel Core i7 processor, it carries an NVIDIA GeForce MX350 graphics card, 16GB of RAM, 1TB of SSD storage, and a 17-hour battery life. Its display comes in the form of a 14-inch FHD IPS2 touchscreen protected by a Corning Gorilla Glass cover, offering more functionality with increased durability.

The Porsche Design Acer laptop is now available on the design firm’s website, going for $2,450 USD.

You can now buy Asus’ latest 11th Gen laptops

A bunch of Asus’ latest laptops featuring Intel’s 11th Gen processors are now available for purchase.

The one I’m most excited about is the ZenBook Flip S, which Asus says is the world’s thinnest OLED convertible laptop and the first Asus laptop to be verified by Intel’s Evo platform. The Flip S has a gorgeous OLED screen as well as excellent speakers and a light, convertible build. It’s a good choice if you’re looking for a great streaming or multimedia experience.

Another solid buy here is the ZenBook 14 UX425EA. This one doesn’t have a touchscreen like the Flip S, but it has shown better performance and better battery life. (There’s a 1W screen option with increased power efficiency.) Both of these models have a cool feature called NumberPad 2.0, which can make an LED NumPad appear on the touchpad.

Also in the lineup are the ZenBook S UX393 (the world’s lightest and thinnest 3:2 3K laptop, per Asus), the ZenBook 14 UX435 (which includes a second screen with Asus’ ScreenPad technology), and a whole slew of new Vivobooks. And there’s the ZenBook Pro 15 UX535, an OLED creator-focused ZenBook that still has 10th Gen processors.

You can buy most of these models at B&H as well as the Asus eShop. Some are also available through Newegg, Amazon, or Sam’s Club.

Samsung Odyssey G7 32-inch 1000R Curved Monitor Review: Extreme in Every Way

Samsung’s 32-inch Odyssey G7 is all about extremes, and that’s what makes it one of the best gaming monitors. The 32″ Samsung Odyssey G7, the C32G75T, packs 240 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, DisplayHDR 600 and extended color into a 2K, VA panel with a 1000R curvature, the tightest curve we’ve seen yet. Most monitors at the top of the speed charts are 25-inch flat panels, but Samsung’s breaking the mold with the 32-inch G, going for $750-$800 as of writing. Samsung has truly pulled out all the stops here.

We’ve talked about what makes gaming monitors different from rank-and-file enterprise displays. More refresh rate, more resolution, more color, more features, more size — the key word is more. Gamers no longer have to settle for 22 inches and 60 Hz when 27-inch 144 Hz panels are commonplace. And IT managers aren’t going to buy 34-inch ultrawide curved monitors for their office staff.

The most obvious extreme here is the Odyssey G7’s curvature. The radius is just 1,000mm, which is the most extreme curve we’ve seen to date. At first glance, one might question such a tiny radius with a 16:9 panel but when you see this 32-inch beauty in front of you, it makes perfect sense. There is a tremendous amount of screen area, and the extra height you get over a 34- or 35-inch 21:9 display is significant.

Speed is another extreme feature here. The Odyssey G7 tops out at a 240 Hz refresh rate, which makes it equal to many other monitors on paper. Color quality is also in the extreme category. Extended color is included to the tune of 85% DCI-P3 coverage. That by itself is not extreme but the C32G75T’s out of box accuracy certainly is, which we’ll show you shortly. It’s one of the few monitors we could not improve upon with calibration.

If you can’t have a full-array local-dimming (FALD) backlight, which helps make for the best HDR monitors, the next best way to render high contrast and effective HDR is with a VA panel and a dynamic contrast feature. The C32G75T has both of those in its core feature set. Native contrast is comfortably over 2,000:1, and Samsung includes a local dimming option in the on-screen display (OSD) that selectively modulates part of the edge array to increase contrast.

Assembly and Accessories of 32” Samsung Odyssey G7

You’ll need to get the Phillips-head screwdriver from your toolbox to assemble the 32-inch Samsung Odyssey G7.

First, attach the base to the upright with its captive bolt. Next, mate the panel with four more bolts. Then, a ring split in two pieces goes on the stand’s pivot point. It lights up when you turn the power on for a neat textured look. After you’ve made cable connections, a cover goes over the input panel, and you can hide the wires inside the upright for a super-clean look.

Bundled cables include USB and DisplayPort, and you get a large external power brick. If you want to use a monitor arm, a bolt-on adaptor comes in the box.

Product 360

Styling is game focused with two small LED lights at the front and a ring around the upright’s attachment point. Color and effect can be controlled from the OSD or you can turn it all off if you wish. The bezel is 9mm wide around the top and sides and just shy of one inch at the bottom. A tiny Samsung logo is the only other thing visible from the front. Reach up under that logo and you’ll find the OSD joystick which controls all monitor functions.

The styling continues around back with an array of smoothly flowing lines that accentuate the panels curvature. There isn’t a straight edge anywhere. The pivot ring appears to be in motion with its turbine-like texture. If you install the input cover and run your cables through the upright, the monitor presents a super-clean appearance.

The stand is substantial. There’s is a bit of wobble at the pivot point, but no more than one would expect from such a large panel. Adjustments include 4.7 inches of height, 15 degree swivel to either side, 9/13 degree tilt and a portrait mode. We’re not sure when one would use a 1000R curved monitor in portrait mode, but if you think of a reason, this is one of the only such screens that can do it.

The jack panel is a bit unusual in that it includes one HDMI 2.0 port but two DisplayPort 1.4 inputs. You also get USB 3.0; one upstream and two downstream ports. A 3.5mm audio jack accommodates headphones or powered speakers .There are no built-in speakers.

OSD Features of 32-inch Samsung Odyssey G7

Samsung has included its gaming-styled OSD in the 32-inch Odyssey G7. At the top, you can always see the Black Equalizer setting, response time (overdrive), refresh rate, Adaptive-Sync (G-Sync or FreeSync) status and low input lag setting. All options have six sub-menus.

Up first is Game, appropriately. Interestingly, when Adaptive-Sync is engaged in Windows, the overclock, overdrive, low input lag and aspect options are grayed out. No worries though. The refresh rate defaults to 240 Hz, overdrive is locked to its middle setting, where it works flawlessly, low input lag is turned on and the screen size maps each incoming pixel without overscan. If you’re having trouble seeing shadow detail, turn up the Black Equalizer. And Virtual Aim Point puts one of six different reticles on the screen, where you can move it about with the joystick.

The Picture menu has a nice set of image adjustments, which you won’t need if you choose the Custom or sRGB modes. Both are extremely accurate right out of the box. Just set brightness to taste, and you’re done. If you want to tweak though, there are nine total image presets, plus RGB sliders for color temp and three gamma options. The Black Level field sets the threshold for PC versus AV signals. DisplayPort properly defaults to PC level, but the HDMI input defaults to video, which means dynamic range is reduced. Change it from Low to Normal for sources connected via HDMI.

Samsung hides the local dimming and dynamic contrast options in the System menu. Setting Local Dimming to Auto means it will only be used for HDR signals. Turning it on leaves it engaged for all content. If you prefer, you can use Dynamic Brightness which modulates the entire backlight where local dimming selectively dims just parts of it. That is the better option and it works very well.

In this menu, you can also adjust headphone volume, set a power-off timer and control the lighting effects. You can also set the USB ports to remain active when the power’s off to charge devices.

Recommended Calibration Settings

The C32G75T comes set to its Custom picture mode, where all image controls are available. Despite our efforts, we could not improve upon the already excellent picture quality and accuracy. The only thing we changed was the sharpness slider, which needed to be reduced to 56 to remove a slight ringing effect. In HDR mode, you can adjust brightness; we maxed it and set Local Dimming to Auto for an excellent HDR image.

Gaming and Hands-on with 32-inch Samsung Odyssey G7

The C32G75T’s extreme curve is a real asset, not only for gaming, but for general use too. While a 21:9 or 32:9 screen will cover even more of a user’s peripheral vision, the height of a 32-inch monitor really draws you in while providing a more familiar shape for workday tasks. Documents can be placed center screen with utilities off to the sides. And you can see the full page in a word processor or 60 rows of a spreadsheet. These things are more difficult to accomplish on a 34-inch ultra-wide. Image distortion was never an issue.

We’ve always been fans of the 32-inch, 16:9 format. The C32G75T is just like that, only curved. You’d think a 1000mm radius would be extreme, and it is, but it doesn’t call as much attention to itself as the photos suggest. Working on documents was just as easy as if the screen were flat. At a 2 or 3-foot viewing distance, image distortion wasn’t noticeable.

In SDR mode, we were impressed with the C32G75T’s image both with and without the local dimming feature. When it’s off, the contrast ratio is still over 2,000:1, which puts it ahead of any IPS monitor. Engaged, it ups dynamic range to around 4,000:1 for a visible difference. To do this, set it to On rather than Auto. If you only want local dimming for HDR, set it to Auto. In either case, color is exemplary being both accurate and well saturated. The P3 gamut coverage is enough that you will see a significant improvement over an sRGB monitor.

Watching video is definitely more fun on a 16:9 screen like this. A cinemascope film (2.35:1) plays with narrow black bars on top and bottom. Playing the same thing on a 21:9 would put the bars on the sides. This will come down to user preference, but we like the extra height better than the extra width.

We found no fault with the 32” Odyssey G7’s gaming performance. Both AMD FreeSync and Nvidia G-Sync Compatibility worked equally well, running at 240 Hz with HDR through the DisplayPort input. Frame rates in Tomb Raider hit 200 frames per second (fps) a few times with sustained speeds around 180 fps. Coupled with super-fast panel response, this made motion and input lag completely free of artifacts or distractions. Again, that extra height really drew us into the game. We couldn’t see the pixel structure, even when sitting 2 feet away. Samsung’s excellent contrast and accurately saturated color enhanced the image details, like textures.

Engaging HDR gave us a rare treat. Samsung’s ultra-curved monitor does HDR very well with effective selective dimming. We never saw the light level change in practice, but we definitely saw the extra dynamic range. Blacks were very deep but well-detailed, and highlights popped, thanks to the 600-nit peak brightness. Frame rates in Call of Duty: WWII only dropped a little from the additional HDR processing load. We saw sustained speeds around 160 fps with peaks in the 180s.

The 32-inch Odyssey G77 is primarily a gaming monitor, but after a few days, we found it to be more versatile than the average ultrawide screen. And its extreme curve only enhanced — never detracted from — the experience.

Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level

In addition to the Odyssey G7, we have two other 32-inch VA displays in our database: the Gigabyte G32QC and Dell S3220DGF. Samsung also brings speedy operation with its 27-Inch CRG5 240 Hz monitor. We also threw in our two most recently reviewed speed demons, the 360 Hz Asus ROG Swift PG259QN and 280 Hz Asus TUF VG259QM.

Samsung rates the 32” Odyssey G7 as hitting 320 nits brightness for SDR signals, but our sample was comfortably over 380 nits. That much light from such a large screen is enough to illuminate a small room. Bigger screens don’t need to exceed 400 nits in SDR mode to provide enough output for a good picture.

The four VA panels have less than half the black level luminance of the two IPS monitors from Asus. The C32G75T has the highest black level of that four, but it’s still lower than any IPS or TN display can muster. Resulting contrast is a little low for a VA monitor, 2220.8:1. That figure rises to around 4,000:1 if you turn the local dimming on for SDR signals. There is no downside to this option, so we recommend using it.

After Calibration to 200 nits

Our calibrated black level and contrast measurements are taken with local dimming turned off to show the panel’s native response. The top three VA monitors still beat the Odyssey G7 by a smidge, but the Samsung still delivers a deep and dimensional image with saturated color and true blacks.

ANSI contrast is a respectable 1,921.4:1. Although other VA monitors can do better, this is not a deal-breaker. The 32” Odyssey G7 has many other virtues which make this a non-issue.

The Odyssey G7 defaults to its Custom picture mode, and that’s where it should stay for best results. Though all calibration controls are available, there is no need or benefit to adjustment. It has one of the most accurate default images we’ve come across.

Grayscale and Gamma Tracking

Only a few professional monitors can match the accuracy of our review focus. It’s one of the best we’ve measured. Grayscale errors are completely invisible with only 10 and 20% reading higher than 1 Delta E (dE). Gamma is also visually perfect. The tiny aberration at 90% represents only 2 nits, which is almost nothing.

If you prefer the smaller sRGB color gamut for SDR gaming and video, Samsung provides a usable mode that includes near-perfect grayscale and gamma tracking. Its red is a little over-saturated, as you’ll see in the next section, but it is still very functional.

Comparisons

Though we were able to adjust the C32G75T’s Custom picture mode, we could not make the grayscale tracking any better. By default, it’s as close to perfect as we’ve seen. The sRGB mode’s 0.82dE value is also impressive. Gamma deviates from 2.2 by only 1.36% with a tight 0.05 range of values. It doesn’t get much better than this.

Color Gamut Accuracy

Measuring the Odyssey G7 against the P3 spec shows a little under-saturation of the green primary, but all other targets are spot-on. The average error of 1.45dE is extremely low for any monitor and especially impressive for a gaming display.

The sRGB mode is also nearly error-free, but the red primary is visibly over-saturated. You’ll notice slightly ruddier flesh tones and more brilliant sun and fire textures. There is a slight magenta hue error as well.

Comparisons

0.93dE represents the C32G75T’s native P3 color gamut. Our sRGB average error was just 1.80dE. You can see that Samsung takes accuracy seriously because our review subject was bested only by the Samsung 27” CRG5. Of course, all the monitors here put up impressive color numbers with accurate and vivid saturation of all hues.

We’ve tested a few monitors that surpass 90% coverage of P3, but our review focus covered a little more than the competition. The bottom three screens in our Color Gamut Volume chart above are sRGB-native screens, so their results are appropriate. In the Odyssey G7’s case, you’ll want to use a software profile when working with color-critical apps in the sRGB or P3 gamuts.

The question to ask about any HDR monitor is, “How well does it do HDR?” There are three categories, FALD, edge-lit with dynamic contrast and edge-lit without dynamic contrast. The 32” Odyssey G7 falls in the middle. It’s edge-lit but has a terrific selective dimming function that answers the aforementioned question with, “Very well, thank you!”

HDR Brightness and Contrast

The C32G75T tops its DisplayHDR 600 spec with over 618 nits peak brightness in HDR mode. We measured this using a window pattern. Full field rasters produced a peak of around 460 nits. This indicates the use of selective dimming, which is very effective in producing a convincing HDR effect. You can see how low the Samsung and Dell black levels are because they both use this feature. Resulting contrast is far greater than the rest, and it shows in the image. The Odyssey G7 does HDR justice.

Grayscale, EOTF and Color

This monitor’s HDR prowess extends to its grayscale, luminance and color accuracy. There are no color adjustments available for HDR signals, but you can change brightness; we recommend maxing it. Grayscale tracking shows a barely visible greet tint above 65%. We could see it in test patterns but not in games or videos. The EOTF curve transitions a tad early and runs slightly dark above 65% brightness, but again, this is not visible in actual content.

Gamut accuracy is among the best we’ve seen from any monitor. The 32” Odyssey G7 easily keeps pace with reference-class and expensive professional monitors like the Acer ConceptD CP7271K or Asus ProArt PA32UCX. This level of accuracy goes a long way to justifying this monitor’s HDR capability. It’s one of the best we’ve seen.

Viewing Angles

VA is not the best choice of panel for off-axis viewing, but the Odyssey G7’s curvature means it’s unlikely to be shared. A single user sitting at a comfortable distance will see no issues. At 45 degrees, there is a slight purple tint and a 40% brightness reduction. You’ll see the same dimming when viewing the monitor from the top with a shift to green and red. In either case, detail remains visible at all brightness levels, but the image looks a little washed out.

Screen Uniformity

Considering the C32G75T’s extreme curve, one might expect some glow or bleed, but our sample showed none. We measured a small hot spot in the upper left corner, but that was all. No other color or tonal uniformity issues were visible.

Pixel Response and Input Lag

Our comparison chart clearly shows the differences and benefit of different refresh rates. A 240 Hz screen like the C32G75T will draw a full frame in 5ms. 280 Hz lops off 1ms, and the 360 Hz PG259QN takes only 3ms to cover the screen. Any of these monitors will appear to have no motion blur, but a 5ms response time definitely looks better to the eye than 7ms.

The Odyssey G7 also delivers super-low input lag with a total time of 20ms. Interestingly, the 240 Hz CRG5 matched the 360 Hz Asus in this test, which measures the time from control input to full-frame render. The results presented above are impressive. In practice, any of the top four displays will satisfy gamers of all skill levels.

Most gaming monitor categories are well-stocked with choices. If you’re looking for a 27-inch flat panel, a 25-inch super-speed display or a 34-inch ultrawide, you can choose from dozens of different products at a wide range of prices. Truly unique displays are more rare, but Samsung has managed to create something we haven’t seen before. The 32-inch Samsung Odyssey G7 combines the best parts of all categories into a singularly functional, high-performance monitor.

If you’re looking for a large screen, the Odyssey G7’s 32-inch 16:9 panel will easily fill your view. Its 1000R curve and grand height immerses you in the gaming environment, and 1440p resolution brings plenty of detail and high frame rates. With 240 Hz refresh, blur is a non-issue. Flawless FreeSync and G-Sync operation, along with perfect overdrive means motion resolution stays smooth at all speeds.

A VA panel delivers good native contrast and makes effective use of local dimming, even though it relies on an edge backlight. Our HDR test measured over 17,000:1 contrast, putting the 32” Odyssey G7 in an elite group of monitors that render excellent HDR. With 85% DCI-P3 coverage, there is plenty of color to go around, along with deep blacks and bright highlights. And that color is extremely accurate. Calibration is completely unnecessary — just turn it on and go.

Though Samsung lists the monitor for $800, we found it on the street for around $750. For what you get, that’s a decent price. With performance that nearly equals the fastest monitors we’ve tested and image accuracy that rivals premium professional monitors, the 32” Odyssey G7 is in a class by itself. It is indeed a product of extremes, but the most important fact is that it is an extremely good monitor in all respects.

Fujitsu LifeBook UH-X is a 1.4 pound laptop with a 13.3 inch screen

Japanese electronics company Fujitsu has a history of making ridiculously lightweight laptops, but the new Fujitsu LifeBook UH-X/E3 takes things to extreme.

It’s a notebook with a 13.3 inch full HD display, an Intel Tiger Lake processor with Intel Xe graphics and full-sized Ethernet and HDMI ports. But the laptop measures just 0.61 inches thick and weighs just 1.4 pounds.

Of course, something’s got to give, and in this case it’s the battery.

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH-X/E3 has a 25Wh lithium-ion battery, which is pretty anemic by modern standards. Fujitsu says you can expect up to 11 hours of battery life under ideal conditions, but I suspect you should probably cut that number in half in real-world conditions.

The RAM is also soldered to the motherboard and there’s no way to upgrade it.

Fujitsu does offer a similar laptop called the LifeBook UH90/E3 with a 50W battery, but that model has a starting weight of 1.8 pounds.

HP’S LATEST CHROMEBOOK X360 14C GETS A FAR MORE AFFORDABLE VARIATION FOR $230 LESS

When we reviewed the new HP Chromebook x360 14c back in July of this year, we praised the build quality, feel and overall speed of HP’s latest consumer-focused Chromebook. In many ways, it is one of the best Chromebooks on the market at this point and would be our top pick for 2020 aside from the fact that the Acer Chromebook Spin 713 exists. With both of these Chromebooks sharing the same MSRP of $629, it is tough to recommend the HP over the Acer. We expect to see a lot of sale prices going into the end of the year, but it looks like HP is preemptively taking things a step further by shipping a far more competitive version of their already-great flagship Chromebook.

Meet HP’s $399 x360 14c

Out of nowhere, the new $399 HP Chromebook x360 14c has shown up on HP’s website and at Walmart, and there’s not much of a drop off versus the far more expensive version we tested this summer. From what we can tell, HP chose to swap the 10th-gen Core i3 with the 10th-gen Pentium Gold processor and removed 4GB of RAM. Apart from those two changes, this looks to be the exact same Chromebook as the $629 model.

For reference, the Pentium Gold is one of Intel’s entry-level, large core processors. It won’t be quite as fast as the Core i3 and won’t handle massive multitasking quite as well, but that doens’t mean it is a slouch, either. Instead, I’d presume this chip will perform quite well for the vast majority of Chromebook users and at the end of the day most won’t be able to discern much difference between the two.

The other change – 4GB of RAM down from 8GB on the pricier model – is likely one that many users won’t bristle against, either. We’re all fans of more RAM for future proofing, but the truth is general use cases for Chromebooks rarely push the need for 8GB of RAM. This will change over time and just as we once had lots of entry level devices with what is now a completely unacceptable 2GB of RAM, we now have many with 4GB. For now, it is fine. That may not hold for the duration of this Chromebook’s life cycle, however, and by June of 2028 when this device stops getting updates, you may be really feeling constrained by only having 4GB of RAM available.

Apart from these changes, it seems HP has left the rest of the x360 14c equation intact and that is a massive win. At $399, users are getting an all-aluminum build, great screen, superb keyboard/trackpad, solid speakers, and USI pen input. This Chromebook feels anything but entry-level, so $399 is a very attractive price point to start the conversation with this one. Additionally, the official spec sheet from HP lists this model with a biometric fingerprint scanner, so there’s actually a possibility for an upgrade with the more-affordable model. I expect this is a misprint, but we can’t be sure until we get one in the office to try out.

Either way, at $399, this could be the new mid-range Chromebook to beat. It has stiff competition in the Lenovo Flex 5, however, since that device boasts the same convertible form factor, USI pen input, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage, 250 nits of brightness, and backlit keyboard. At $409, Lenovo’s mid-ranger also packs in the more-powerful Core i3. HP’s $399 offering does give users a better overall build quality and classier aesthetic, however, so it does feel like a pretty even trade. If HP’s new x360 14c does end up coming with the fingerprint scanner, I’d have to give the win to HP here as long as the Pentium Gold performs the way we expect it to.