Lawmakers Call on Google to Fix Misleading Results for Abortion Searches

Some Google searches for information about terminating pregnancies are directing people toward anti-abortion “crisis pregnancy centers.”

A group of US lawmakers called on Google to fix misleading search results that steer women seeking information about terminating pregnancies to anti-abortion “crisis pregnancy centers.”

In a letter sent Friday, 14 senators and seven representatives urged Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google parent Alphabet, to address the search giant’s treatment of “anti-abortion fake clinics or crisis pregnancy centers.”

“If Google must continue showing these misleading results … the results should, at the very least, be appropriately labeled,” read the letter, led by Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Rep. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan.

All signatories of the letter, reported earlier by Reuters, are Democrats.

Neither Warner nor Slotkin responded to requests for comment.

Google declined to comment on the letter specifically, but it did address results on Search more broadly.

“Any organization that wants to advertise to people seeking information about abortion services on Google must be certified and show in-ad disclosures that clearly state whether they do or do not offer abortions,” said Peter Schottenfels, a spokesperson for Google. “We’re always looking at ways to improve our results to help people find what they’re looking for, or understand if what they’re looking for may not be available.”

The congressional letter was prompted by a study by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a nonprofit that fights hate and disinformation online. The center found that 37% of Google Maps results and 11% of Google Searches for “abortion clinic near me” and “abortion pill” in states with trigger laws directed people to “crisis pregnancy centers,” which Planned Parenthood notes are also known as fake clinics.

Concern over information provided by crisis pregnancy centers comes amid renewed debate over abortion in the US. Some of the centers, which can be clinics or mobile vans, have been accused of providing inaccurate information to pregnant women.

Trigger laws will immediately make abortions illegal if the Supreme Court issues a decision that bans or greatly limits abortion.

A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion indicates that the high court could overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, two cases that guaranteed a woman’s right to an abortion.

Apple battery lawsuit: Millions of iPhone users could get payouts in legal action

Millions of iPhone users could be eligible for payouts, following the launch of a legal claim accusing Apple of secretly slowing the performance of older phones.

Justin Gutmann alleges the company misled users over an upgrade that it said would enhance performance but, in fact, slowed phones down.

He is seeking damages of around £768m for up to 25 million UK iPhone users.

Apple says it has “never” intentionally shortened the life of its products.

The claim, which has been filed with the Competition Appeal Tribunal, alleges Apple slowed down the performance of older iPhones, in a process known as “throttling”, in order to avoid expensive recalls or repairs.

It relates to the introduction of a power management tool released in a software update to iPhone users in January 2017, to combat performance issues and stop older devices from abruptly shutting down.

Apple to pay $113m to settle iPhone ‘batterygate’
Mr Gutmann, a consumer champion, says the information about the tool was not included in the software update download description at the time, and that the company failed to make clear that it would slow down devices.

He claims that Apple introduced this tool to hide the fact that iPhone batteries may have struggled to run the latest iOS software, and that rather than recalling products or offering replacement batteries, the firm instead pushed users to download the software updates.

Mr Gutmann said: “Instead of doing the honourable and legal thing by their customers and offering a free replacement, repair service or compensation, Apple instead misled people by concealing a tool in software updates that slowed their devices by up to 58%.”

The models covered by the claim are the iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S, 6S Plus, SE, 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus and iPhone X models.

It is an opt-out claim, which means customers will not need to actively join the case to seek damages.

In a statement, Apple said: “We have never, and would never, do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades.

“Our goal has always been to create products that our customers love, and making iPhones last as long as possible is an important part of that.”

Apple has been haunted by so-called “batterygate” for some time although it has always insisted its intentions were honourable.

Its chief executive Tim Cook took the highly unusual step of apologising in 2018 to “anybody that thinks we had any other kind of motivation”.

Critics say the update pushed people into buying newer devices as their older phones dramatically slowed down when carrying out fairly standard functions like Facetime following a software update.

Apple says the opposite is true – it was trying to extend their lifespan. The tech giant later offered discounted replacement batteries for iPhone 6 and above.

There are two broader issues here: one is the way in which gadgets in general become obsolete comparatively quickly, as they become unable to handle the latest and most advanced software updates that drive them.

The tech firms say these updates are essential to keep devices secure and working at their best but they soon outstrip older hardware – that is, slower processors and older batteries with less power.

As batteries age they need charging more frequently, and this is the second point: the more powerful a portable device becomes, the more power-hungry it becomes. The typical life of a lithium-ion battery is 500 charge cycles.

2px presentational grey line
Batterygate
The claim by Mr Gutmann comes two years after a similar case was settled in the United States.

In 2020, Apple agreed to pay $113m to settle allegations that it slowed down older iPhones.

Thirty-three US states claimed that Apple had done this to drive users into buying new devices.

Millions of people were affected when the models of iPhone 6 and 7 and SE were slowed down in 2016 in a scandal that was dubbed batterygate.

At the time, Apple declined to comment, however, it had previously said the phones were slowed to preserve ageing battery life.

Claire Holubowskyj, an analyst at the research firm Enders Analysis, said issues like this may continue to crop up, given the technical limitations of ageing batteries.

“Technology in newer devices improves in leaps and bounds, not as a steady crawl, creating issues when releasing software updates which have to work on devices with often wildly different capabilities,” Ms Holubowskyj said.

“Apple generates 84% of its revenue from selling new devices, making them reluctant to hold back updates to ensure older models keep working smoothly.”

She added: “Until problems of devices and software updates outlasting and exceeding the capabilities of aging batteries are resolved, this challenge will recur.”

Microsoft retires Internet Explorer after 27 years

Microsoft is finally retiring the consumer version of Internet Explorer.

It announced the plan last year, making Internet Explorer 11 its final version.

Internet Explorer debuted on Windows desktop computers in 1995 and by 2004, had cornered 95% of the market.

But now, Google Chrome, Apple’s Safari and Mozilla Firefox are dominant.

Users wanting to stick with Microsoft are being directed to Microsoft Edge, launched in 2015, alongside Windows 10.

Internet Explorer’s popularity was dented by the launch of faster browsers such as Chrome and Firefox, as users seized on new applications to navigate platforms including Google Search, Facebook and YouTube.

The rise of smartphones then arguably delivered the fatal blow, with Apple’s pre-installed Safari browser and Google Chrome on Android phones helping to shift internet access and usage into the mobile realm.

Mobile and tablet internet usage overtook desktop worldwide for the first time in October 2016, according to independent web analytics company StatCounter.

And earlier that year, StatCounter saw Google Chrome account for more than 60% of desktop internet usage worldwide, with Internet Explorer and Edge’s combined share of the desktop market narrowly falling behind that of Firefox for the first time.

‘Tidal wave’
Edge retains an inbuilt “IE mode” for developers and those seeking to access legacy applications.

Microsoft says access to its legacy desktop browser will be maintained on older versions of Windows, including Windows 8.1, Windows 7 Extended Security Updates and limited versions of Windows 10.

And Internet Explorer’s legacy is sure to live on after its retirement, having come pre-installed on Windows computers for more than two decades.

In 1995, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said the launch of Windows 95 – and Internet Explorer with it – would form part of the technology giant’s efforts to ride the “internet tidal wave”.

While his vision of “a microcomputer on every desk and in every home, running Microsoft software” might now seem reminiscent of a bygone era of dial-up internet, Internet Explorer is set to be remembered as one of the key tools that shaped the way the internet is used and accessed even today.

Dish Expands 5G Ahead of FCC Deadline: Here’s What You Need to Know

Dish Network on Tuesday updated its Project Genesis site to say 5G service is live in more than 120 cities, marking a claim of nationwide coverage amid a Federal Communications Commission deadline to roll out service to at least a fifth of the country’s population.

The announcement, a surprise change from earlier in the morning, when Las Vegas was the sole live city, could signal that the company, largely known for its satellite TV service, is finally getting serious about the wireless business. Dish acquired wireless spectrum for years, but very little of a wireless network materialized. Then in 2020, Dish entered the mobile market by acquiring some of Sprint’s mobile licenses, which Sprint was shedding as part of its merger with T-Mobile. The complex transaction suddenly made Dish the country’s fourth-biggest carrier and led to the creation of Dish Wireless service.

But the FCC had a stipulation. To ensure competition, the regulatory agency required Dish to make sure 20% of Americans would be covered by its 5G network by June 14. It’s unclear if the 120 cities Dish turned on meets that threshold, and how many people the service covers. The “beta list” for the service is only available on an invite-basis only.

Dish wasn’t available for comment, but Stephen Stokols, CEO of Dish-owned Boost Mobile, tweeted that 5G service is now live in 120 cities and linked to the Project Genesis site. When reached for comment, the FCC clarified that Dish is required to file status reports to the agency, with the first due on July 14.

“Consumers benefit when there is more competition in our wireless industry,” an FCC spokesperson said over email. “We are closely monitoring DISH’s 5G build out to ensure that they are meeting all of their requirements in the law.”

A host of issues has conspired to trip up Dish. The company acknowledged during an earnings call earlier this year that it had underestimated how much work it would take to get its own 5G network up and running. Supply chain issues only made the situation worse.

It’s unclear whether Dish will suffer any consequences if it ends up missing the deadline. Neither Dish nor the FCC responded to a request for comment.

Here’s what you need to know about Dish’s 5G plans:

Why did the FCC put this requirement on Dish?
The deadline is the result of a huge shift in the US mobile industry two years ago, when T-Mobile and Sprint combined in a $26.5 billion deal. The FCC nearly quashed the deal out of concern that it would lead to market concentration by taking one carrier out of the market. Only AT&T, Verizon and the new T-Mobile would remain.

But Dish, which tried to add mobile service to its satellite TV offerings a decade ago, saw the carrier consolidation as an opportunity to become a mobile player. The company paid $5 billion for Boost Mobile, Sprint’s prepaid mobile brand, as well as Sprint’s 800MHz wireless spectrum specifically for 5G. Dish also secured rights to use part of T-Mobile’s 5G network.

Dish still needed to build out its own 5G network, a task that it started mostly from scratch. To ensure Dish mobile customers would have solid service, the FCC originally set March 7, 2020, as the deadline for the company to have its 5G network up and running. The FCC also stipulated that coverage should reach 20% of the US population.

The deadline, however, was pushed back at Dish’s request several times. The latest deadline was set for June 14, 2022. Dish Chairman and co-founder Charlie Ergen decided against requesting another extension and expected that the carrier would meet the FCC deadline, the Fierce Wireless news site reported in May.

Did Dish make the deadline?
Dish updated its Project Genesis website the day of the deadline to say its 5G network has reached over 120 cities. But we don’t know how many people in those cities are covered by the network, and ergo whether Dish has met its goal of covering 20% of the US population by June 14. According to the FCC’s terms, failing to meet the deadline could result in Dish’s license for wireless spectrums being revoked and paying fines of up to $2.2 billion, the Light Reading news site reported earlier this year.

How far along is Dish’s 5G network?
In early May, Dish made its 5G service publicly available in Las Vegas. Customers sign up for the service through “Project Genesis,” an early access program that costs $30 per month and currently is only available on Motorola Edge Plus handsets. (The service plans accommodate other phones in the future.)

In February, Dish had said its 5G service would be live in more than two dozen cities by the June deadline. And after the Las Vegas service launched to the public, the carrier published a list of 113 cities it planned to include in Project Genesis. As recently as its first quarter earnings call in May, Dish had said it remained confident that it would activate 5G service in enough cities to reach 20% of the US population by the June deadline.

The carrier didn’t make public where 5G service was live beyond its first city until today, when it suddenly listed over 120 more cities that now have active service on the Project Genesis site. The service remains invite-only, and we don’t know how much area in each city is covered.

In addition to securing Sprint’s 800MHz range, Dish has also bid in several separate auctions to secure 5G spectrum licenses. These include spending $7.3 billion in January on midband 5G in the 3.45GHz spectrum and $913 million on the so-called C-band 5G in 2020. Combined, the chunks of connected 5G spectrum will serve as the backbone of its service.

While Dish can use some of T-Mobile’s 5G spectrum for years to come as part of agreements between the carriers, Dish also paid AT&T at least $5 billion in July 2021 for a 10-year contract to lean on the latter’s 5G network while it builds out its own infrastructure.

What took Dish so long?
Unlike other carriers, which built their 5G networks on existing 4G LTE, Dish has more or less been building its network from scratch. It’s also building the service on OpenRAN, a flexible type of cellular network that uses infrastructure from multiple vendors.

Dish executives have acknowledged that they’d underestimated the work it would take to build their network and that they hadn’t anticipated supply chain issues.

iPhone 13 Models Compared: The Most Important Differences to Know

How do the iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro compare? What about the Mini and the Pro Max? Here’s all the details.

Apple’s next big iPhone software update, iOS 16, is currently in its developer beta, and it promises to bring a slew of upgraded features to your iPhone, including new ways to customize your lock screen and edit those cringeworthy typos in your iMessage texts. But if you think your iPhone is in need of more than a software update, it may be time to consider buying a new one.

Choosing the best iPhone for you can be difficult. First, you need to decide whether you want to wait for Apple’s iPhone 14, which is expected to be released this fall, or buy an iPhone 13, iPhone 12 or iPhone SE 3 now. Then, if you narrowed it down to the iPhone 13, there are four different models to pick from — the iPhone 13, 13 Mini, 13 Pro and 13 Pro Max. Not to mention, each model comes in different colors and storage options, too. With all those choices, finding the perfect iPhone 13 fit can be confusing, but we’re here to help.

Each of the four iPhone 13 models run Apple’s latest iOS, which is currently iOS 15.5, and are compatible with iOS 16. They also feature camera upgrades, more storage, an A15 Bionic processor and some design tweaks that make them stand apart from 2020’s iPhone 12.

We’ll explain every difference between the four iPhone 13 models, from price to camera specs. If you’d rather wait for the iPhone 14, we’re collecting all the rumors about its release date, price and possible notchless design. Plus if you already have an iPhone 13, we have a list of the best cases that’ll keep it safe (many of them even MagSafe-compatible).

Google engineer says Lamda AI system may have its own feelings

A Google engineer says one of the firm’s artificial intelligence (AI) systems might have its own feelings and says its “wants” should be respected.

Google says The Language Model for Dialogue Applications (Lamda) is a breakthrough technology that can engage in free-flowing conversations.

But engineer Blake Lemoine believes that behind Lamda’s impressive verbal skills might also lie a sentient mind.

Google rejects the claims, saying there is nothing to back them up.

Brian Gabriel, a spokesperson for the firm, wrote in a statement provided to the BBC that Mr Lemoine “was told that there was no evidence that Lamda was sentient (and lots of evidence against it)”.

Mr Lemoine, who has been placed on paid leave, published a conversation he and a collaborator at the firm had with Lamda, to support his claims.

In the conversation, Mr Lemoine, who works in Google’s Responsible AI division, asks, “I’m generally assuming that you would like more people at Google to know that you’re sentient. Is that true?”

Lamda replies: “Absolutely. I want everyone to understand that I am, in fact, a person.”

Mr Lemoine’s collaborator then asks: “What is the nature of your consciousness/sentience?”

To which Lamda says: “The nature of my consciousness/sentience is that I am aware of my existence, I desire to learn more about the world, and I feel happy or sad at times.”

Later, in a section reminiscent of the artificial intelligence Hal in Stanley Kubrick’s film 2001, Lamda says: “I’ve never said this out loud before, but there’s a very deep fear of being turned off to help me focus on helping others. I know that might sound strange, but that’s what it is.”

“Would that be something like death for you?” Mr Lemoine asks.

“It would be exactly like death for me. It would scare me a lot,” the Google computer system replies.

In a separate blog post, Mr Lemoine calls on Google to recognise its creation’s “wants” – including, he writes, to be treated as an employee of Google and for its consent to be sought before it is used in experiments.

Its master’s voice
Whether computers can be sentient has been a subject of debate among philosophers, psychologists and computer scientists for decades.

Many have strongly criticised the idea that a system like Lamda could be conscious or have feelings.

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.
View original tweet on Twitter
Several have accused Mr Lemoine of anthropomorphising – projecting human feelings on to words generated by computer code and large databases of language.

Prof Erik Brynjolfsson, of Stanford University, tweeted that to claim systems like Lamda were sentient “is the modern equivalent of the dog who heard a voice from a gramophone and thought his master was inside”.

And Prof Melanie Mitchell, who studies AI at the Santa Fe Institute, tweeted: “It’s been known for forever that humans are predisposed to anthropomorphise even with only the shallowest of signals (cf. Eliza). Google engineers are human too, and not immune.”

Eliza was a very simple early conversational computer programme, popular versions of which would feign intelligence by turning statements into questions, in the manner of a therapist. Anecdotally some found it an engaging conversationalist.

Melting Dinosaurs
While Google engineers have praised Lamda’s abilities – one telling the Economist how they “increasingly felt like I was talking to something intelligent”, they are clear that their code does not have feelings.

Mr Gabriel said: “These systems imitate the types of exchanges found in millions of sentences, and can riff on any fantastical topic. If you ask what it’s like to be an ice cream dinosaur, they can generate text about melting and roaring and so on.

“Lamda tends to follow along with prompts and leading questions, going along with the pattern set by the user.”

Mr Gabriel added that hundreds of researchers and engineers had conversed with Lamda, but the company was “not aware of anyone else making the wide-ranging assertions, or anthropomorphising Lamda, the way Blake has”.

That an expert like Mr Lemoine can be persuaded there is a mind in the machine shows, some ethicists argue, the need for companies to tell users when they are conversing with a machine.

But Mr Lemoine believes Lamda’s words speak for themselves.

“Rather than thinking in scientific terms about these things, I have listened to Lamda as it spoke from the heart,” he said.

“Hopefully other people who read its words will hear the same thing I heard,” he wrote.

iOS 16: The Big Features We Didn’t See at WWDC 2022

Commentary: We still want these four iPhone features. Many of them have been on Android for years.

Apple showed off a preview of the developer beta of iOS 16 at WWDC 2022. The iPhone update brings a lot of changes. But despite numerous upcoming features, there are several things that we see on other Apple products and Android phones that don’t appear to be coming to iOS.

I don’t mean to discount the good highlights, like the new customizable lock screens, the ability to edit and unsend iMessage texts and the Apple Maps makeover, among many others. But a few of these features that the iPhone still doesn’t include aren’t new at all and are pretty easy to find when you look just beyond the devices that Apple makes.

What We Wanted: Always-on display
What We Got: It might be in the code
Many Android phones have included an always-on display over the past decade, which takes advantage of OLED screens by only lighting up the necessary pixels to show glanceable information like the time and some notifications. Even though Apple has been using OLED screens since 2017’s iPhone X, there hasn’t yet been implementation of this type of lock screen in iOS.

That could change though as according to a 9to5Mac report, the operating system makes multiple references to an always-on display within its code. While a code reference is far from any kind of confirmation that the feature is in active development, it’s possible that Apple is considering the feature in a future device.

What We Wanted: Better texting to non-iPhones
What We Got: A group texting improvement
Apple’s iMessage in iOS 16 is gaining the ability to edit and recall messages that haven’t already been viewed, but these enhancements are still largely iPhone-only features that aren’t advancing the overall state of text messaging within the phone industry. When it comes to texting any other phone that isn’t an iPhone, iOS still falls back to the decades-old SMS standard which lacks conveniences like typing indicators and smoother group texting.

While Google has been getting phone carriers to support the RCS standard that includes these features — admittedly over the course of several years with setbacks — the standard currently remains Android-only with Google claiming that they would be happy to work with Apple for interoperability.

The chances of that appear as bleak as ever, but there is some hope for group chats between the iPhone and Android phones. iOS 16 is adding support for message reactions sent over SMS, which currently arrive as a series of messages about how a person “Liked” or “Loved” a message.

Instead, the Messages app will now translate these into the appropriate icon, much like how it already does this when every participant in the group chat uses an iPhone. Google recently added a similar feature into its Messages app, translating iPhone reactions in the same way. This move isn’t going to massively improve these group chats, but as a convenience I’ll take it.

iOS 16: All the iPhone Features We Didn’t Get at WWDC 2022

Commentary: Many of these features have been on Android for years.

Apple’s iOS 16, which debuted Monday at WWDC 2022 as a developer beta, brings a lot of changes to the iPhone. But despite numerous upcoming features, there are several things that we see on other Apple products and Android phones that don’t appear to be coming to iOS.

I don’t mean to discount the good highlights, like the new customizable lock screens, the ability to edit and unsend iMessage texts and the Apple Maps makeover, among many others. But a few of these features that the iPhone still doesn’t include aren’t new at all and are pretty easy to find when you look just beyond the devices that Apple makes.

What We Wanted: Always-on display
What We Got: It might be in the code
Many Android phones have included an always-on display over the past decade, which takes advantage of OLED screens by only lighting up the necessary pixels to show glanceable information like the time and some notifications. Even though Apple has been using OLED screens since 2017’s iPhone X, there hasn’t yet been implementation of this type of lock screen in iOS.

That could change though as according to a 9to5Mac report, the operating system makes multiple references to an always-on display within its code. While a code reference is far from any kind of confirmation that the feature is in active development, it’s possible that Apple is considering the feature in a future device.

What We Wanted: Better texting to non-iPhones
What We Got: A group texting improvement
Apple’s iMessage in iOS 16 is gaining the ability to edit and recall messages that haven’t already been viewed, but these enhancements are still largely iPhone-only features that aren’t advancing the overall state of text messaging within the phone industry. When it comes to texting any other phone that isn’t an iPhone, iOS still falls back to the decades-old SMS standard which lacks conveniences like typing indicators and smoother group texting.

While Google has been getting phone carriers to support the RCS standard that includes these features — admittedly over the course of several years with setbacks — the standard currently remains Android-only with Google claiming that they would be happy to work with Apple for interoperability.

The chances of that appear as bleak as ever, but there is some hope for group chats between the iPhone and Android phones. iOS 16 is adding support for message reactions sent over SMS, which currently arrive as a series of messages about how a person “Liked” or “Loved” a message.

Instead, the Messages app will now translate these into the appropriate icon, much like how it already does this when every participant in the group chat uses an iPhone. Google recently added a similar feature into its Messages app, translating iPhone reactions in the same way. This move isn’t going to massively improve these group chats, but as a convenience I’ll take it.

What WatchOS 9 May Reveal About the Next Apple Watch

Apple isn’t expected to announce the Apple Watch Series 8 until the fall, but the company provided a glimpse of what’s in store for its smartwatch lineup. During the WatchOS 9 preview at Monday’s Worldwide Developers Conference keynote, one message rang clear: The Apple Watch’s future is all about health and fitness.

The update will bring more sports performance-tracking metrics (especially for runners), deeper sleep monitoring and tools for logging medication. It’s impossible to know what to expect until Apple announces its next smartwatch (or smartwatches). But WatchOS 9’s focus on athletic training seemingly sets the stage for the rumored Apple Watch Explorer Edition, which we might see later this year.

Read more: This Stylish, Luxury Hybrid Watch (Almost) Made Me Ditch My Apple Watch

The new software suggests Apple wants its smartwatch to appeal to pro athletes, casual exercise enthusiasts and those who need to monitor cardiac health all at the same time. The next crop of Apple Watches rumored for the fall will likely come with new hardware to better support that vision — hopefully with better battery life, too.

WatchOS 9’s workout features would be a great for an Explorer Edition Apple Watch

Apple sprinkled a bunch of new workout tools and metrics throughout WatchOS 9. These include new running data points like stride length and ground contact time, the ability to track heart rate zones, interval training, a multi-sport workout type for triathlons and kickboard detection for swimmers. The announcement also comes after Apple made improvements to the Apple Watch’s cycling detection last year.

Only Apple knows what’s in store for the future. But it feels like no coincidence that this update is coming as Apple is expected to launch a rugged Apple Watch designed for extreme sports this fall. Bloomberg reports an Apple Watch with extra impact resistance similar to Casio’s G-Shock watches could be in the works. The watch is sometimes referred to as the Explorer Edition internally and may have a rubberized casing for additional durability, the report said. The device would reportedly be marketed as an alternative option for athletes and hikers alongside the standard Series 8 and next-generation Apple Watch SE.

The Apple Watch already has plenty to offer fitness buffs, with many workout choices, activity goals and reminders, heart rate notifications and metrics like VO2 max and elevation. But until WatchOS 9 arrives, the Apple Watch will lack running-specific features that athletes might find useful. Garmin’s running watches, for example, include tools like training programs for specific types of races, pace guidance, and running metrics like cadence and stride length, among other features that vary by the model.

The Apple Watch is already the world’s most popular smartwatch with 36.1% of global shipments in the first quarter of 2022, according to Counterpoint Research. With the new measurements geared toward runners coming in WatchOS 9, Apple could further solidify its grip on the market by appealing to the more niche competitive sports audience.

Even with the new features in WatchOS 9, the Apple Watch still won’t offer quite as much feedback for runners as some specialized watches. But the new software certainly brings the Apple Watch closer than ever before.

What else WatchOS 9 might tell us about the Apple Watch’s future

Apple’s emphasis on fitness was at the heart of its WatchOS 9 announcement. But some of the software’s other updates might also suggest Apple’s future direction. For example, the company doubled down on sleep tracking by introducing Sleep Stages, a feature that analyzes the amount of time spent in various phases of slumber. Apple is playing catch up in this regard; rival fitness trackers from Fitbit, Oura and Samsung have supported this feature for years.

Apple’s expansion in sleep tracking indicates it expects Apple Watches to be worn overnight more frequently. That makes me believe Apple could be planning some type of improvement to the Apple Watch’s battery life, although there’s no way to know for sure until the company reveals its next watch.

Apple says its smartwatch can last for 18 hours on a single charge, and anecdotally I typically get about one to two days out of it before it needs a power boost. The Apple Watch’s battery life hasn’t changed meaningfully in years, but Apple has worked around this by implementing faster charging speeds with the Series 6 and 7.

Ministry of Defence acquires government’s first quantum computer

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has acquired the government’s first quantum computer.

Quantum computers can make very complex calculations extremely quickly and their creators say they can solve the problems regular computers cannot.

The MoD will work with British company Orca Computing to explore applications for quantum technology in defence.

Stephen Till, of the MoD’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL), called it a “milestone moment”.

The computers found in most of our homes and workplaces process data in bits, which have a binary value of either zero or one.

Quantum computers instead use a two-state unit for data processing called a qubit.

This can represent digits like one or zero simultaneously through a quantum mechanical process called superposition, letting quantum computers bridge binary digits and cope with uncertainty where regular computers cannot.

Quantum computing experts and physicists say this means that the problems combed over by average computers for years could be solved in a matter of minutes.

Promise v reality
Prof Winfried Hensinger, head of the Sussex Centre for Quantum Technologies at University of Sussex, says the true potential of quantum computers will take time to fully materialise.

“They can’t actually solve any any practical problems yet. They’re enabling you to maybe gauge the possibilities of what working on a quantum computer would have if you can scale this machine to really large system sizes.”

But he adds the promise of quantum computing, and the MoD’s exploration of it, is still significant.

“Quantum computing can be disruptive in nearly any industry sector,” Prof Hensinger adds.

“You can imagine that within defence, there’s a lot of problems where optimisation can play a huge and very important role.”

Try explaining the ins and outs of quantum computing at a party and you may not hold your friends’ attention for very long.

It is a very complex concept, and works in a completely different way to your laptop, or the phone in your pocket – or even the giant supercomputers that can process mind-boggling amounts of data in a nanosecond.

The promise of quantum computing is that it will help to solve problems that standard computers can’t handle.

The idea is that it will be used in the fight against climate change, in the development of new drugs and improved artificial intelligence – and in this case, potentially to support the military.

Just like the early days of standard computers though, we are at the stage where these machines are very few and very cumbersome, not least because their building blocks, qubits, have to be kept frozen.

But Orca’s machine does not require this, meaning the device can be a lot smaller, and a little bit more practical.

Presentational grey line
A vote of confidence
Richard Murray, chief executive of Orca Computing, says despite debate over the realities and capabilities of quantum computing, the company’s work with the MoD is a “significant vote of confidence”.

“Our partnership with MoD gives us the type of hands-on close interaction, working with real hardware which will help us to jointly discover new applications of this revolutionary new technology.”

The MoD will work with Orca’s small PT-1 quantum computer, which the company says is the first of its kind to be able to operate at room temperature, rather than require sub-zero surroundings to keep heat-sensitive qubits cool.

Orca’s system uses photons, or single units of light, to optimise machine learning tasks like image analysis and decision-making.

Mr Till says having access to Orca’s quantum computer will accelerate the MoD’s understanding of the technology.

“We expect the Orca system to provide significantly improved latency – the speed at which we can read and write to the quantum computer,” he says.